Saturday, September 20, 2008

Paper or digital?

Trying to figure out what the heart of the debate about e-readers is a little difficult. I just read a short bit about a new e-reader, the iRex Digital Reader 1000, being released on Monday that got me thinking about whether it was time I bought into the technology. Reading the comment stream of the article pretty much captured all my internal conflicts on the subject. I like having a bunch of text at my fingertips, but I like the feeling of a book in my hands. I like the idea of having less clutter of books around the house, but I like to see them there on my bookshelf. I like the idea of digital media being cheaper, but I doubt that I read enough for the cost difference of the material to offset the cost of the hardware. I'm not sure if I'm part of the book retailers mass market, but I think I've figured out features that would reach the tipping point for consumers like myself.

  1. Pricing. There has to be a price advantage. There's no getting around it. I buy about 2 books a month. The price of a top notch e-reader is about $650. I would have to save about $18 a month buying the digital form of a book for 3 years to make back the price of the e-reader. Unfortunatly a lot of ebooks I've seen are selling around the cost or even more then the printed edition. Even the music industry gives a better deal then that. The Kindle books through Amazon sometimes gives you a few dollars savings, but it doesn't really add up for me. A possible value may come from something other then book purchasing. For example, although I only buy a couple books a month I have about 50 in the queue. If there was some kind of model where I could "rent" a book for a week for a few dollars that would be good or if they used a subscription plan like Netflix for digital books that might even be better.
  2. Convenience. The ability to browse through books and purchase them from anywhere almost pulled me into buying a Kindle. I'm one of the most impatient people in the world so I like the idea of getting the books I want right now and reading them from wherever I am. Beyond the purchasing convience I think they could also add other things that would make my life a bit simpler. For example, since most e-readers use E Ink they can be read in direct sunlight. I would hope they would take advantage of that and put a solar charger on it somewhere. If that feature were there I think I would have to get one just in case I got stranded on a deserted island somewhere.
  3. Compatablility. All things text. Okay music and video would be cool, but it needs to be able to display all things text. I don't want something that can display anything but PDFs, that's just silly. There are about 75% (maybe) of the books I want in digital form, but that's not enough. There also needs to be all the magazines I can think of. Magazines usually contain about 10% useful information, but we hang on to them for years. To me that's a perfect thing to have digitally archived.
  4. More Awesomeness. The expensive features pedicted on the iRex are almost a necessity for me (except for the bluetooth, I've never really figured out what that's for). I think that they have the right idea about the touchscreen and the stylus. I hate having to print out technical journal articles just so I can mark them up and then lose the article in a big stack of others. I would also want my markup and notes to be archived, searchable and shareable. I want to be able to to search all the text in all types of documents. I know it's a lot to ask, but I want it to have a deep amount of customization that's very easy to setup.
If all the above features were there I think I could justify buying a e-reader. I would use it for all the magazines, pop fiction, scientific papers and time sensitive technical books. The books would get in paper form would be books I would like as a perminent part of my reference library like Thinkertoys or fiction I really enjoyed like The Great Gatsby. Until then I guess I'll need to make room in the house for another bookshelf.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Cool more video ...

I've been seeing a lot of news about how IMDb added video to their site. I like the addition because it allows you to center around a video and work yourself around the web of actors, photos and random information tied to it, but for me I don't understand the huge value around it. It's convenient not having to go to Hulu or YouTube I guess. I think IMDb's value comes mostly from being such a comprehensive and "connected" site. I think Amazon would benifit more from doing a better job of integrating it's other staple products (books and music) to the site pages. Like the new movie "Watchmen" for example. If I go to Amazon and search for "Watchmen" I get these results. If I'm looking up "Casablanca" there's a good chance I saw the movie and there was something about it that interests me. Give me links to history books about WWII and how it affected parts of the world like Casablanca or get me to music like As Time Goes By. When people love a movie they want stay apart of it after it's over. Amazon should take advantage of the ability to offer these connections to movies like Casablanca and help keep them in Rick's Cafe a little longer.

NOTE: I forgot mention that IMDb is owned by Amazon.